OPTION #1: CHARACTER ANALYSIS
1. An argument the states how the character's personality contirbutes to the plot and the theme.
2. At least two examples od indirect characterization as support.
3. An explanation of how each piece of support support your main argument.
In the story Cat in the Hat, each character's personality are different either they are the the Id who the devil who sit on your shoulder, or the ego the angel and superego. Every personality are decribe in there inner though and what make us different from other. The cat in, Cat in the Hat is more likely to be the Id of the story. Because he the one who cause all the problem and with out him the story wouldn't have a conflict . Another things about the Cat is that he make up the plot , because he the one who bring conflict to the story, which this make him a big part of the story. One of the example of the conflict is when the Cat did his trick even though the fish say no. and then he also brought in thing one and two which cause even more problem . Then thing one and thing two got the house all mess and even cause a bigger conflict now that the house is all in a mess. Which it was all cause by the Cat who seem to want to do thing his way. The way he contributes to the theme is that he show his own thinking and the way he want thing to be his why , he mainly has his own independent though. The cat contribute to the story more then the narrator and his sister Sally. Because as you read through the story you would find that the narrator and Sally doesn;t say much at all, much like the Cat he say things that he want to or even more his feeling of doing things his way. The cat is an indirect characterization one example is, he the way he always say thing so joyful and always wanting to have fun. The tone of his vioce seem to always want to do thing that only include having fun. He also don't really even listen to anyone and just keep saying things about what he want to do and have fun. Also the cat is like always so carefree watever he say.. oh dang this sum up pretty much about how the cat is a indirect character. Each part of the support i have give a support to my agurment that the cat is really a big part of the story, he sum up the whole story as well. Plus the story wouldn't even be call Cat in the Hate. The support i give are part that give you the idea of the Id of the story while the other character can be a ego or a superego. This also give people the idea of what the story is telling you which one is an Id or ego and superego. For like Sally and the narrator they are see different in through each part of the story they are most like the ego and in the middle the Id. For the fish you can tell right alway that he is the ego all the way, th eone who want to stop the conflict. Which this give us the support that the cat play a big part in the story who contributes to the theme and plot of the story. This is pretty much what i think so what do you think about this then? Give me so comment .......
1. An argument the states how the character's personality contirbutes to the plot and the theme.
2. At least two examples od indirect characterization as support.
3. An explanation of how each piece of support support your main argument.
In the story Cat in the Hat, each character's personality are different either they are the the Id who the devil who sit on your shoulder, or the ego the angel and superego. Every personality are decribe in there inner though and what make us different from other. The cat in, Cat in the Hat is more likely to be the Id of the story. Because he the one who cause all the problem and with out him the story wouldn't have a conflict . Another things about the Cat is that he make up the plot , because he the one who bring conflict to the story, which this make him a big part of the story. One of the example of the conflict is when the Cat did his trick even though the fish say no. and then he also brought in thing one and two which cause even more problem . Then thing one and thing two got the house all mess and even cause a bigger conflict now that the house is all in a mess. Which it was all cause by the Cat who seem to want to do thing his way. The way he contributes to the theme is that he show his own thinking and the way he want thing to be his why , he mainly has his own independent though. The cat contribute to the story more then the narrator and his sister Sally. Because as you read through the story you would find that the narrator and Sally doesn;t say much at all, much like the Cat he say things that he want to or even more his feeling of doing things his way. The cat is an indirect characterization one example is, he the way he always say thing so joyful and always wanting to have fun. The tone of his vioce seem to always want to do thing that only include having fun. He also don't really even listen to anyone and just keep saying things about what he want to do and have fun. Also the cat is like always so carefree watever he say.. oh dang this sum up pretty much about how the cat is a indirect character. Each part of the support i have give a support to my agurment that the cat is really a big part of the story, he sum up the whole story as well. Plus the story wouldn't even be call Cat in the Hate. The support i give are part that give you the idea of the Id of the story while the other character can be a ego or a superego. This also give people the idea of what the story is telling you which one is an Id or ego and superego. For like Sally and the narrator they are see different in through each part of the story they are most like the ego and in the middle the Id. For the fish you can tell right alway that he is the ego all the way, th eone who want to stop the conflict. Which this give us the support that the cat play a big part in the story who contributes to the theme and plot of the story. This is pretty much what i think so what do you think about this then? Give me so comment .......
0 comments:
Post a Comment